Add/remove tags to this thread

Topic: The Dark Side of the Eclipse

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:

The Dark Side of the Eclipse

Permalink   
 
Here is a comment I just added to my chronology files on the errors of the Mayan Calendar which I realized last night :

We should state that, even though the odds are that the Mayan Calendar is off, it if probabaly not off by a significant amount of years. Since it was recalibrated using the Christian Calendar, which only turned out to be off by about 2-4 years, then the most that the Mayan Calendar will be in error is one of their 20 years cycles.

Now, get this.

If they chose the wrong eclipse they could be off in two ways. As stated above, if they are too soon, then we would have to wait that 20 years from 2012 AD for the end of their 13th Baktun placing the start of the new cycle circa 2032 AD - in this regards Sitchin was wrong for he stated that their calendar was cyclical and, therefore, would not end at this time however, though their calendar is cyclical, it is based on major epochs and one of which will end - this time by Earthquake and/or Poleshift - at the end of the 13th Baktun.

Now, to continue, if, however, they are too late, it is not going to be an error of 18 years - or we certainly would have known by now - but by the two year difference between the Saros Cycle and their 20 year cycle.

In other words, if they chose the Dark Side of the Eclipse, so to speak, the end of the 13th Baktun would actually occur December 21, 2010 AD...

http://theoferrumii.geocities.master.com/texis/master/search/showmsg.html?id=4cb49dd51b#m4cb49dd51b



-- Edited by Theoferrum on Tuesday 12th of October 2010 12:56:30 PM

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
Interestingly enough, there is a Saros Series that ends about that same time : Number 110 ends in 2027 AD :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Saros_series_for_lunar_eclipses

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
Now, to conclude, I was thinking about this :

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulation/realtime/movie.html

When you look at the Magnetosphere it is getting consistantly worse. Now, however, why woudl the Winter Solstice be an important date.

Well, its because we have at least two holes in the Ozone which reflects the two holes that we probabaly have in the Magnetosphere which allows increasing cosmic rays in which deteriorate the Magnetic Field even more.

When the Winter Solstice comes around that hole will be directly in front of the Sun and we will have no "shields" for the earth.

Thus, you can expect the condition to worsen drastically between now and December 21, 2010 AD.

The Pole Shift itself could occur anytime between now and then...


__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
Supposedly the Sun reverses every Solar Cycle of about 11 Years but the problem according to Wiki we have already started our next Solar Cycle in Dec of 2008 or possibly August of 2009 - shouldn't the Sun's Polarity have flipped by now? If not why not? Is it about to? Before 2012?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_cycles

Now, note this quote from NASA :

"Changes in the Sun's magnetic field are carried outward through the heliosphere by the solar wind," explains Steve Suess, another solar physicist at the Marshall Space Flight Center. "It takes about a year for disturbances to propagate all the way from the Sun to the outer bounds of the heliosphere."

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast15feb_1/

Well if the New Cycle started in August of 2009 and it takes about a year for it to 'propagate' then that would mean, to me, that the Sun should be flipping out any day now.

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
Solar Cycles average 10.7 or 11 years but this fluctuates anywhere from 9 to 14 years. It also seems to have a 22 year cycle so I would guess that you could narrow it down by looking at the last two times the Sun reversed.


__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 

Well, interestingly enough, NASA originally predicted the nest Solar Maximum for 2010 AD and then jumped on the 2012 Bandwagon :

Solar maximum
or solar max is the period of greatest solar activity in the
solar cycle of the sun. During solar maximum, sunspots appear.

A solar maximum is the period when the sun's magnetic field lines are the most distorted due to the magnetic field on the solar equator rotating at a slightly faster pace than at the solar poles. The
solar cycle takes an average of about 11 years to go from one solar maximum to the next with an observed variation in duration of 9 to 14 years for any given solar cycle.

Historic maxima

The last solar maximum was in 2000. The next solar maximum is currently predicted to occur in May 2013 and to be one of the weakest cycles since 1928.

The unreliability of solar maxima predictions is demonstrated in that NASA had previously predicted the solar maximum for 2010/2011 and possibly to occur as late as 2012.

Previously, on March 10, 2006, NASA researchers had announced that the next solar maximum would be the strongest since the historic maximum in 1958 in which the
northern lights could be seen as far south as Rome, approximately 42° north of the equator.

Film

There is an IMAXdocumentary about solar maximum called Solarmax.

See also

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Solar-maximum/114192398597490



-- Edited by Theoferrum on Tuesday 12th of October 2010 01:30:44 PM

-- Edited by Theoferrum on Tuesday 12th of October 2010 01:39:25 PM

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
Gee, would NASA want people to think they still had two more years when in all actuallity time might be up in a couple of months?

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1219053/pg1

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
This needs its own thread but it started with this Mayan Calendar thread : The Point of that thread was that the Mayan Calendar was off by two years and the real end date is here in 2010 : I have just now proven that with the Time Wave Zero thing cause his start date is also off by two years and thus would end sometime here in 2010 also :

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Get this : The Time Wave Zero Guy : One guy says that the Math doesn't fit his Zero date and his original date was November of 2012 but he streamlined it to fit the Mayan Date. Further if you go from when the first Atomic Bomb was actually detonated this would move the zero date back another couple of months.

"The approach he originally took to determining the Zero Date was to look for an event of great novelty in recent history, and to take this as the start of the final 67.29-year (24,576-day) cycle. The use of a uranium bomb to kill 80,000 civilians on 1945-08-06 seemed to him the most likely candidate for such an event. Adding 67.29 years to the date of the incineration of Hiroshima brings one to mid-November 2012. Influenced by the fact that the current 13-baktun cycle of the Maya Calendar ends in December 2012 McKenna adopted 2012-12-22 as the zero date."

[link to current.com]


The point is that the Zero Date is being contested by alot of people and there is a great 'rift' in the Zero Date he has chosen. In other words, it could be off by a couple of years in either direction and it ultimately depends upon finding the start date for that 67 Year Ruler.

For instance, the whole concept deals with the advance of Knowledge. The Time Wave Nuclear Explosion if you will, that McKenna himself used was LSD - shrooms - in search of knowledge. Well, it just so happens that two years before the big nuke explosion, on April 19, 1943 – "Albert Hofmann self administers the drug LSD for the first time in history, and records the details of his trip."

Another event of 1943 that could be considered the start date for the 67 year Calibration : Notice the connection to Knowledge via Computers :

"The United States Army contracts with the University of Pennsylvania's Moore School to develop the computer ENIAC."

But here is the real Time Wave Zero start date that Eclipses even the Atomic Explosion and that actually fits, precisely, the Theme of the Time Wave itself, for rumor has it that the Philadelphia Experiment breached Time itself :

October 28, 1943 – The Philadelphia Experiment, in which the U.S. destroyer escort USS Eldridge was to be rendered invisible to human observers for a brief period.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Theoferrum (OP)
User ID: 1083417
us.png United States
10/13/2010 11:58 AM
fh4th115.gif

Edit Post
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Real Time Wave Zero Start Date!!!Quote

Thus, this would place the Zero Date as 67 years and 106 days later on February 11, 2011 AD.

Exactly 21 Days after the Winter Solstice...
If my websites do not load its because I've been Black Listed

Welcome to my World...

[link to theoferrum.activeboard.com]


__________________


Welcome to my World...


Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:
Permalink   
 
Definition of ERGODIC
1: of or relating to a process in which every sequence or sizable sample is equally representative of the whole (as in regard to a statistical parameter)
2: involving or relating to the probability that any state will recur; especially : having zero probability that any state will never recur

__________________


Welcome to my World...


Cassie
Posts:
Date:

ToCadUFOKZfbkOvCv

Permalink   
 
Free info like this is an apple from the tree of koenwldge. Sinful?

__________________
Carly
Posts:
Date:

xiccuLHWxWPuAxdrkZ

Permalink   
 
Your website has to be the eelctorinc Swiss army knife for this topic.

__________________
Janet
Posts:
Date:

eljRsTuheUHKBe

Permalink   
 
Your articles are for when it asboluelty, positively, needs to be understood overnight.

__________________
Bubba
Posts:
Date:

Jncylfnoemy

Permalink   
 
Good to see a taenlt at work. I can't match that.

__________________
Wood
Posts:
Date:

quCrRjotTfgocVHz

Permalink   
 
Wait, I cannot fathom it being so srtaigthfowarrd.

__________________
Aundre
Posts:
Date:

MrqNnEMDJYfgzUMFp

Permalink   
 
Ppl like you get all the brains. I just get to say tanhks for he answer.

__________________
Budd
Posts:
Date:

mVAxYPFEgSL

Permalink   
 
I'll try to put this to good use imemdaitely.

__________________
Janelle
Posts:
Date:

yECPAWMOHeYmXITNEH

Permalink   
 
Ah yes, nicely put, ervyenoe.

__________________
Keiwan
Posts:
Date:

xrRCvXcKWTCIATCFAZ

Permalink   
 
You've rlaely impressed me with that answer!

__________________
Marron
Posts:
Date:

JuFSwwYlGHGe

Permalink   
 
Hey just wanted to give you a tiny heads up and let you know a few of the eagmis aren’t appearing properly. I’m not really sure why but I think it maybe a image link issue. I’ve viewed it in two different internet browsers and both show the same problem.

__________________
Alvera
Posts:
Date:

KMQzDsCtqZ

Permalink   
 
I am often to blogging and i earlly appreciate your content. The article has earlly peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Members Login


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard